Source: 9.mshcdn.com

Symantec, antivirus leader and developer of PC protection software, has proposed that customers disable pcAnywhere remote control software. The recommendation comes after news of a potential breach of security by hackers, who may have acquired former source code used in the program. Although Symantec provides to its customers that the application of patches to update and following the recommendations of the manufacturer for the correct operation of the software are sufficient enough to deter attack probable, there always is a risk that users of the software can have their computers taken remotely by "intermediaries".

New reflect a growing trend in malicious hacker activity to the security companies, Web sites and software. At this time, it appears that no entity is is safe from possible with security, regardless of their Government or corporate association. In this particular case, the greatest threat applies to the activity related to the company by the pcAnywhere software - there is a possibility that hackers can take control of the computer and access valuable data which are used by a company for commercial purposes. Such a breach of security may result in the seizure of sensitive data such as the consumer information (including information card credit, the names and addresses, etc.) and private financial information of the company or its employees.

Persons using the software are still at risk, but it is less likely that they will be targeted all simply because the data they have on their personal computers are probably not nearly as valuable as the data which can be viewed on corporate networks, servers and computers. While that identity theft is a serious concern for such persons, the pirates would spend much more time and effort in order to raise the numbers of credit cards, addresses and other personal information than they would for similar information on whole societies. Frankly, the reward is great for hackers targeting businesses and organizations.

In General, the internet experienced a dramatic increase in the frequency and severity of the database of piracy. All Web sites of the Government in security companies have had their services cut, closure of Web sites and information stolen from the hands of remote hackers with the skills to cut through preventive security measures. In addition to the relatively benign piracy that occurs between the companies and the internet criminals, were increases in government intervention through web content such as viruses. The virus "Stuxnet" infamous contaminated Iran's nuclear facilities, a part of their equipment making it useless while informing operators that everything was fine. The virus was transmitted to a point where he was essentially pervasive in government computers and networks in several counties that have no target. The virus itself was scheduled to address a very specific target - Iranian nuclear facilities - and remain dormant until this objective had been found.

All this comes as law (i.e. soup & PIPA) to effectively control the flow of information through the internet, was recently shot. Cases of violations of hacking and security like this can expect to become examples of hazards associated with the current state of the exchange of information on the internet for the proponents of this law.